Skip to content
RGPD

Article 77

Powers of authorities protecting fundamental rights and cooperation with market surveillance authorities

1.   National public authorities or bodies which supervise or enforce the respect of obligations under Union law protecting fundamental rights, including the right to non-discrimination, shall have the power to request and access any information or documentation created or maintained from the relevant market surveillance authority pursuant to this Regulation in accessible language and machine-readable format by electronic means where access to that information or documentation is necessary for effectively fulfilling their mandates within the limits of their jurisdiction. This Article is without prejudice to the competences, tasks, powers and independence of the relevant national public authorities or bodies under their mandates.

1a.   Subject to the conditions specified in this Article, the market surveillance authority shall grant the relevant public authority or body referred to in paragraph 1 access to such information or documentation, including by requesting such information or documentation from the provider or the deployer, where necessary and without undue delay.

1b.   Market surveillance authorities and public authorities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 shall cooperate closely and provide each other with the mutual assistance necessary to fulfil their respective mandates, with a view to ensuring the coherent application of this Regulation and Union law protecting fundamental rights and streamlining procedures, while respecting their respective competences, tasks, powers and independence. This shall include, in particular, exchange of information where necessary for the effective supervision or enforcement of this Regulation and the respective other Union legislation.

2.   By 2 November 2024, each Member State shall identify the public authorities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 and make a list of them publicly available. Member States shall notify the list to the Commission and to the other Member States, and shall keep the list up to date.

3.   Where the documentation referred to in paragraph 1 is insufficient to ascertain whether an infringement of obligations under Union law protecting fundamental rights has occurred, the public authority or body referred to in paragraph 1 may make a reasoned request to the market surveillance authority, to organise testing of the high-risk AI system through technical means. The market surveillance authority shall organise the testing with the close involvement of the requesting public authority or body within a reasonable time following the request.

4.   Any information or documentation obtained by the national public authorities or bodies referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article pursuant to this Article shall be treated in accordance with the confidentiality obligations set out in Article 78.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What powers do national authorities have concerning high-risk AI systems?

National authorities protecting fundamental rights, such as non-discrimination, can request from the relevant market surveillance authority any information or documentation created or maintained under the AI Act, where needed for their mandate. That authority must grant access, asking the provider or deployer where necessary. If the documentation is insufficient to establish an infringement, they can ask it to have the high-risk AI system tested.

Who decides which authorities oversee AI systems protecting fundamental rights?

Each EU Member State identifies the public authorities or bodies that supervise or enforce the respect of obligations under Union law protecting fundamental rights, including the right to non-discrimination. The list had to be made public by 2 November 2024, is notified to the European Commission and the other Member States, and must be kept up to date.

What happens if the available documents aren't enough to determine if an AI system violates rights?

If available documents don't provide enough clarity about possible violations of fundamental rights by an AI system, the responsible authority can request additional testing from the market surveillance authority.

This additional testing is organized soon after the request and involves cooperation between both authorities, ensuring thorough investigation of the AI system's compliance.

Is documentation obtained by authorities regarding AI systems kept confidential?

Yes, any information and documentation that authorities access regarding high-risk AI systems are subject to confidentiality obligations.

Authorities must protect the collected information, ensuring it is used appropriately and securely, as defined specifically by the confidentiality standards detailed in Article 78 of the AI Act.

AI literacy

Habits with AI are forming right now, in every team. AI literacy helps every colleague use AI well and use AI safely.

AI ActChapter 1Article 4

AI literacy

1. Providers and deployers of AI systems shall take measures to support the development of AI literacy of their staff and other persons dealing with the operation and use of AI systems on their behalf, …